lördag 22 januari 2011

Happiness is so nonsynonymous with joy or pleasure that it is not infrequently sought and felt in grief and deprivation. It depends not nearly so much on the things to which one ascribes it as on the ability and tendency of the soul to transform its outer condition into its inner destination, to seize its own particular circumstances with a sort of yearning desire and to cling to it… The deeper and more humane the psychic constitution, the more easily does melancholy well up in it and suffuse it… What is usually called happiness, therefore, or peace, is mostly only a living on those levels which never touch upon the depths of humanity. The happiness which is truly desirable can only be the culmination of that profound mood when we feel true inner being in its intimate connection with all that is great in the world, so that all sensation of opposition and strife disappears. And this can be true only of brief moments. But whoever is surrounded by the element of pain, grief, and melancholy in its unclouded purity, he feels at home in it and feels a sense of well-being. For, unnoticed, there increase in him the powers of inward humanity. He embraces nature more intimately, penetrates it more powerfully, and in moderation and renunciation leads a rich and infinite life which he would exchange for no other… Everything profound by its very nature has feelings of grief and pain at its core. But ordinary people do not sense it. They rise up in arrogance against trouble and grief instead of seeking them out to be their faithful companions. (Wilhelm von Humboldt, Humanist Without Portfolio, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1963, pp. 310-11)

fredag 21 januari 2011

The only human relations that have value are those that are rooted in mutual freedom, where there is no domination and no slavery, no tie except affection, no economic or conventional necessity to preserve the external show when the inner life is dead. One of the most horrible things about commercialism is the way in which it poisons the relations of men and women. The evils of prostitution are generally recognized, but, great as they are, the effect of economic conditions on marriage seems to me even worse. There is not infrequently, in marriage, a suggestion of purchase, of acquiring a woman on condition of keeping her in a certain standard of material comfort. Often and often, a marriage hardly differs from prostitution except by being harder to escape from. The whole basis of these evils is economic. Economic causes make marriage a matter of bargain and contract, in which affection is quite secondary, and its absence constitutes no recognized reason for liberation. Marriage should be a free, spontaneous meeting of mutual instinct, filled with happiness not unmixed with a feeling akin to awe: it should involve that degree of respect of each for the other that makes even the most trifling interference with liberty an utter impossibility, and a common life enforced by one against the will of the other an unthinkable thing of deep horror. It is not so that marriage is conceived by lawyers who make settlements, or by priests who give the name of “sacrament” to an institution which pretends to find something sanctifiable in the brutal lusts or drunken cruelties of a legal husband. It is not in a spirit of freedom that marriage is conceived by most men and women at present: the law makes it an opportunity for indulgence of the desire to interfere, where each submits to some loss of his or her own liberty, for the pleasure of curtailing the liberty of the other. And the atmosphere of private property makes it more difficult than it otherwise would be for any better ideal to take root. It is not so that human relations will be conceived when the evil heritage of economic slavery has ceased to mold our instincts. Husbands and wives, parents and children, will be only held together by affection: where that has died, it will be recognized that nothing worth preserving is left. Because affection will be free, men and women will not find in private life an outlet and stimulus to the love of domineering, but all that is creative in their love will have the freer scope. Reverence for whatever makes the soul in those who are loved will be less rare than it is now: nowadays, many men love their wives in the way in which they love mutton, as something to devour and destroy. But in the love that goes with reverence there is a joy of quite another order than any to be found by mastery, a joy which satisfies the spirit and not only the instincts; and satisfaction of instinct and spirit at once is necessary to a happy life, or indeed to any existence that is to bring out the best impulses of which a man or woman is capable. (Bertrand Russell, Proposed Roads to Freedom, Rockville (Maryland): Arc Manor, 2008, pp. 122-3)

tisdag 18 januari 2011

Oscar Wilde, The soul of man under Socialism,
International capital, a threat to human dignity and life on planet earth,
US vetoes at the UN Security Council,
Chomsky, If the Nuremberg Laws were Applied...,
Los Angeles Times. Worldwide Study Finds Big Shift in Causes of Death,
September 16, 1996 | THOMAS H. MAUGH II | TIMES MEDICAL WRITER, http://articles.latimes.com/print/1996-09-16/news/mn-44495_1_worldwide-study
Randall Shelden, Why we are so punitive,
Elizabeth Becker, "Kissinger Tapes Describe Crises, War and
PROPAGANDA - General (theory, practice and history), http://ics.leeds.ac.uk/papers/vf01.cfm?folder=715&outfit=pmt
National Security Strategy of the United States: 1990-1991, The White House, March 1990
BBC World Service Poll, Wide Dissatisfaction with
Capitalism—Twenty Years after Fall of Berlin Wall, http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/nov09/BBC_BerlinWall_Nov09_rpt.pdf
Michael McClintock, Instruments of Statecraft, http://www.statecraft.org/ 
Noam Chomsky, Intellectuals and the State, http://www.ditext.com/chomsky/is.html