måndag 8 augusti 2011

Erich Fromm, The social philosophy of “will therapy,http://www.erich-fromm.de/data/pdf/1939a-e.pdf
Noam Chomsky, World Order and its Rules, U.S. contempt for the framework of world order is so extreme there is little left to discuss, October 1999, http://www.zcommunications.org/contents/19954/print
Project Paperclip: Nazis in America, by John W. Whitehead, 5/2/2005, http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=337
Mark Twain, Letters from the Earth, http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mvz/bible/ltrs-from-earth.pdf
Chomsky, Market Democracy in a Neoliberal Order, http://www.chomsky.info/articles/199711--.htm
Michael Kidron, A Permanent Arms Economy (Spring 1967), http://www.marxists.org/archive/kidron/works/1967/xx/permarms.htm
The Elkhorn Manifesto, What do Hemp and Hitler have in common? World War II, that’s what. An Open Letter to All Americans, by R. William Davis, http://www.worldaudit.org/The%20Elkhorn%20Manifesto%20-%20R_%20William%20Davis.htm
Joel Beinin and Lisa Hajjar, Palestine, Israel and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Primer, http://www.stanford.edu/group/scai/images/Palestine-Israel_Primer_MERIP.pdf
Andrew Bacevich, Different Drummers, Same Drum, The National Interest, June 1, 2001,
Alan Milchman, D.F. Flemming on The Origins of the Cold War,” http://mises.org/journals/lar/pdfs/1_1/1_1_4.pdf
How Do We Grow?” Challenge, Vol. 48, No. 3, May/June 2005, pp. 50-83, http://www.ellerman.org/Davids-Stuff/Dev-Theory/Challenge-final-scan.pdf
It is the eternal struggle between these two principles – right and wrong – throughout the world. They are the two principles that have stood face to face from the beginning of time; and will ever continue to struggle. The one common right of humanity, and the other divine right of kings. It is the same principle in whatever shape it develops itself. It is the same spirit that says, ‘You toil and work and earn bread, and I’ll eat it.’ (Abraham Lincoln)
I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. … corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war. (Abraham Lincoln)
[N]ationalism and state worship [are] the symptoms of a regression to incestuous fixation. Only when man succeeds in developing his reason and love further than he has done so far, only when he can build a world based on human solidarity and justice, only when he can feel rooted in the experience of universal brotherliness, will he have found a new, human form of rootedness, will he have transformed his world into a truly human home. (Erich Fromm)
             Every child’s ideas of what is evil are formed according to the parents’ defense mechanisms: “evil” can be anything that makes the parents more insecure,” like disobedience. (Alice Miller, For Your Own Good, p. 138)
Someone who has learned at his or her peril to obey unwritten laws and renounce feelings at a tender age will obey the written laws all the more readily, lacking any inner resistance. But since no one can live entirely without feelings, such a person will join groups that sanction or even encourage the forbidden feelings, which he or she will finally be allowed to live out within a collective framework.
            Every ideology offers its adherents the opportunity to discharge their pent-up affect collectively while retaining the idealized primary object, which is transferred to new leader figures or to the group in order to make up for the lack of a satisfying symbiosis with the mother. (Ibid., p. 86)
“A child cannot acknowledge the negative side of his or her father, and yet these are stored somewhere in the child’s psyche, for the adult will then be attracted by precisely these negative, disavowed sides in the father substitutes he or she encounters…”
            When a father speaks to his child, it is the way he speaks that counts, not what he says. “The more he builds himself up, the more he will be admired, especially by a child raised according to the principles of ‘poisonous pedagogy.’ When a strict, inaccessible, and distant father condescends to speak with his child, this is certainly a festive occasion, and to earn this honor no sacrifice of self is too great. A properly raised child will never be able to detect it if this father—this big and mighty man—should happen to be power-hungry, dishonorable, or basically insecure. And so it goes; such a child can never gain any insight into this kind of situation because his or her ability to perceive has been blocked by the early enforcement of obedience and the suppression of feelings…
           [W]hen a man comes along and talks like one’s own father and acts like him, even adults will forget their democratic rights or will not make use of them. They will submit to this man, will acclaim him, allow themselves to be manipulated by him, and put their trust in him, finally surrendering totally to him without even being aware of their enslavement. One is not normally aware of something that is a continuation of one’s own childhood. For those who become as dependent on someone as they once were as small children on their parents, there is no escape. A child cannot run away, and the citizen of a totalitarian regime [or of country in which state-supported private tyranny reigns supreme] cannot free himself or herself. The only outlet one has is in raising one’s own children. Thus, the citizens who were captives of the Third Reich had to rear their children to be captives as well, if they were to feel any trace of their own power.
          But these children, who now are parents themselves, did have other possibilities. Many of them have recognized the dangers of pedagogical ideology, and with a great deal of courage and effort they are searching for new paths for themselves and their children.” (Ibid., pp. 72, 73, 74)